Showing posts with label endorsements. Show all posts
Showing posts with label endorsements. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 21, 2016
Competencies in Context #5: Increasing the Value of Certificates from LinkedIn Learning
By Daniel Hickey and Chris Andrews
The previous post in this series explored LinkedIn endorsements and recommendations. Chris and Dan used those features to locate a potential consultant with particular skills and considered recent refinements to those features. We also explore the new LinkedIn Learning site made possible by the acquisition of Lynda.com. In this post, we explore how endorsements and recommendations might help LinkedIn earn back the roughly $300,000 that they paid for each of Lynda.com's 5000 courses.
Labels:
Chris Andrews,
Dan Hickey,
endorsements,
LinkedIn,
LinkedIn Learning,
Lynda.com,
MOOC,
recommendations,
validity
Tuesday, December 13, 2016
Competencies in Context #4: eCredentialing via LinkedIn Recommendations and Endorsements
by Daniel Hickey and Chris Andrews
In the second
post in this series on eCredentialing, Dan discussed how new digital
Learning Recognition Networks (LRNs) can simultaneously support the goals of
learners, educators, schools, recruiters, and admissions officers. A reader
posted a question on that post about how the endorsement practices afforded by
these new LRNs build on the existing endorsement practices, like those at
LinkedIn. Since its launch in 2002, LinkedIn has grown into the largest digital
LRN in existence. So, this is a great question.
Dan did some digging using his own network to hunt for someone with very
specific competencies, while Chris dug into the recent research and improvements
to LinkedIn Endorsements. We also peeked into the new LinkedIn Learning made possible by the
acquisition of Lynda.com.
Labels:
Chris Andrews,
Daniel T. Hickey,
digital badges,
endorsements,
Learning Recognition Network,
LinkedIn,
LRN,
open badges,
recommendations
Saturday, January 30, 2016
So maybe open badges can get you into Harvard (or Yale or Dartmouth) after all
By Daniel Hickey and James Willis
As summarized in Education Dive and reported in the Boston Globe, Harvard and 80 representatives from other Ivy League schools released a report arguing that admissions officers should give more attention to service-learning and volunteer activities. They recommended:
- "Promoting more meaningful contributions to others, community service and engagement with the public good.
- Assessing students' ethical engagement and contributions to others in ways that reflect varying types of family and community contributions across race, culture and class.
- Redefining achievement in ways that both level the playing field for economically diverse students and reduce excessive achievement pressure."
Those of you who follow RMA can likely appreciate how much this means to us and where this post is going. Yup. Badges and assessment. That second recommendation is going to be a really tough one to implement. As we will elaborate in some length, open digital badges are intended to provide valid evidence of accomplishment outside of accredited contexts. Some new developments may allow them to serve precisely this function.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
